Stray Dogs Released, Supreme Court Modifies Order: Key Observations From the Latest Ruling

Stray Dogs Released, Supreme Court Modifies Order: Conditions for Sterilisation, Vaccination, and Regulated Feeding Explained

Supreme Court Revises Earlier Ruling on Stray Dogs

The debate surrounding stray dogs in Delhi-NCR witnessed a significant turn on Friday as the Supreme Court modified its earlier order that prohibited the release of captured stray dogs. In a fresh directive, the court ruled that stray dogs picked up by municipal authorities must be sterilised, immunised, and then released back into the same locality. This ruling comes after widespread criticism from animal welfare activists who had termed the earlier directive “inhumane.”

A three-judge bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria delivered the order, replacing the controversial August 11 ruling that called for all stray dogs to be shifted permanently to animal shelters. The latest modification ensures a balance between addressing public safety concerns and safeguarding animal rights.

Why the Earlier Order Sparked Controversy

Earlier, a two-judge bench of the apex court had taken suo motu cognisance of rising dog-bite incidents and directed that all strays be rounded up within two months and kept in shelters. The decision was met with strong opposition from citizens, NGOs, and animal rights groups, who highlighted that such mass removal of strays was impractical and cruel. Animal lovers argued that dogs often form territorial bonds, and displacing them permanently leads to aggression, disease spread, and disruption of the ecological balance.

The backlash prompted the larger bench to reconsider the issue, leading to the modified judgment that sets strict conditions while allowing the release of stray dogs.

Read more: Airtel Down in Delhi-NCR: Users Face Call and Internet Issues

Key Takeaways From the Supreme Court’s Modified Order

The latest ruling clarifies the responsibilities of municipal authorities, animal lovers, and NGOs. The most important takeaways include:

• Sterilisation and Vaccination Mandatory: Dogs picked up from streets must undergo sterilisation and immunisation before being released back. Only dogs suffering from rabies or displaying extreme aggression may be kept in shelters.

• Regulated Feeding Zones: Feeding stray dogs on public roads or in open streets has been declared illegal. Instead, municipal authorities are directed to create designated feeding spots in every ward to ensure both animal welfare and public safety.

• Adoption of Stray Dogs: Animal lovers wishing to adopt strays must apply to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD). This formal adoption process will help regulate and ensure responsible pet ownership.

• Financial Contributions by NGOs and Individuals: The court reiterated that NGOs and dog lovers involved in dog care must deposit security amounts—Rs 25,000 for individuals and Rs 2 lakh for organisations—with the registrar to prevent misuse of the process.

These guidelines aim to create a structured framework to deal with stray dog management while ensuring that animals are treated with dignity.

Balancing Safety and Compassion

The modified order by the Supreme Court highlights the delicate balance required between addressing the growing menace of dog bites and respecting the rights of animals. With over 62 lakh stray dogs estimated across India, the issue is not limited to Delhi-NCR. Stray dogs play a role in the urban ecosystem, and mass removal without scientific measures could lead to greater problems.

By enforcing sterilisation and vaccination, the court’s directive supports the long-term goal of controlling the stray dog population humanely. At the same time, the ban on feeding in random public places directly addresses safety concerns raised by citizens who fear attacks due to crowding of dogs around food sources.

Read more: Agni-5 Test: How India’s MIRV-Equipped Missile Boosts Nuclear Deterrence

Way Forward

This ruling is likely to have far-reaching implications beyond Delhi-NCR. Other states and municipal bodies may take cues from the Supreme Court’s balanced approach, ensuring that stray dog management is done with a humane yet practical outlook. It also reinforces the importance of community participation, responsible adoption, and cooperation between municipal authorities and animal welfare organisations.

Ultimately, the modified order on Stray Dogs Released, Supreme Court Modifies Order sets a precedent for addressing the complex issue of stray animals while respecting both human and animal welfare.

We’re now on WhatsApp. Click to join. 

Like this post?
Register at One World News to never miss out on videos, celeb interviews, and best reads.